Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Pentium G4400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 293 days newer than Pentium G4400.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than Pentium G4400 - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4400 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4400
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
129
96.99248120300751%
Value, £/FPS
£0.79/FPS
100%
Price, £
£101.7
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £101.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1634 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
694
58.8135593220339%
Multi-Core
1184
21.605839416058394%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Pentium G4400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |