Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1023 days newer than Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4130 - 127 vs 124 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
84.32203389830508%
Multi-Core
1960
35.76642335766424%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
