Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 2725 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 51% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 140 vs 93 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 28 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1180
47.65751211631664%
Multi-Core
5480
51.844843897824035%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 12 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
