Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2061 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 578 vs 529 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 58238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Single-Core
1171
74.82428115015975%
Multi-Core
5305
100%
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |