Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 20% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 153 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 32 vs 8 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
