Key Differences
In short — Xeon w7-2495X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w7-2495X is 3998 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w7-2495X
- Performs up to 8% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E5-1620 - 228 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 48 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Xeon w7-2495X
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
600
25.412960609911057%
Multi-Core
2238
11.955766867888242%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Intel Xeon w7-2495X |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 15th, 2023 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Xeon W |
| Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Sapphire Rapids |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 4677 |
Server | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 48 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
