Buy on Amazon
£215
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $294
Availability
MSRP in USD: $294
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $313
Availability
MSRP in USD: $313
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1513 days newer than Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-3770K - 101 vs 94 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Consumes up to 45% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 77 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel 3rd Generation Core i7-3770K CPU (4 x 3.50GHz, Ivy Bridge, Socket 1155, 8Mb L3 Cache, Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2.0)
Buy for £215 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76837 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
707
64.98161764705883%
Multi-Core
2469
63.34017444843509%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
