Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100 is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100
- Performs up to 50% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 483 vs 321 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 60 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £117.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77024 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
48.291167332445625%
Multi-Core
3898
53.12798146381355%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |