Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 602 days older than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76668 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
97.15073529411765%
Multi-Core
3294
84.50487429451%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |