Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1105 days newer than FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 36% better in The Callisto Protocol than FX-9370 - 101 vs 74 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 140 vs 220 Watts
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £189.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76823 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |