Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v4 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v4 is 1713 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than FX-6100 - 158 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
