Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 2381 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 5% better in Watch Dogs: Legion than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 143 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Watch Dogs: Legion
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
