Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1620 v3 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1620 v3 is 497 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than FX-4350 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 125 vs 140 Watts
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
