Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4790K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4790K is 233 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4790K
- Performs up to 12% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 174 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 88 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Single-Core
644
46.431146359048306%
Multi-Core
2356
53.618570778334096%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-4790K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 88 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |