Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2126 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 7% better in Fortnite than Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 229 vs 215 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 95 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10643 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Sep 10th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |