Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 1626 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 3% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
172
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.9/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15740 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |