Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2626 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 12% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 227 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1535M v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
