Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 2352 days newer than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 45 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 23% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 157 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
157
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.08/FPS
100%
Price, £
£482.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £482.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 150 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |