Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600K outperforms Xeon E3-1535M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6600K is 117 days older than Xeon E3-1535M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 45 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-6600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1535M v5 - 162 vs 158 FPS
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
162
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.86/FPS
100%
Price, £
£138.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £138.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 0 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 27th, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |