Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14650HX outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14650HX is 4256 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-14650HX
- Performs up to 29% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 153 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i7-14650HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
699
27.62845849802372%
Multi-Core
2480
17.35357917570499%
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-14650HX |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
| 87 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
