Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 25% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 127 vs 102 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
127
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.64/FPS
100%
Price, £
£208
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £208 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17420 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
87 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |