Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 145 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
145
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£145
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |