Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1695 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 175 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 60 vs 87 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i3-7350K
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
699
48.14049586776859%
Multi-Core
2480
86.32091890010442%
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 87 W | TDP | 60 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
