Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7945HX3D is 4091 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
- Performs up to 19% better in God of War than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 196 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 55 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Mobile • Jul 27th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
699
24.8136315228967%
Multi-Core
2480
15.043979375189567%
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FL1 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
| 87 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 610M |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
