Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 3909 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 24% better in Far Cry 5 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 235 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1290 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
699
30.220492866407263%
Multi-Core
2480
27.479224376731302%
Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 87 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
