Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1280 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1280 v3 is 1409 days older than Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 1600 - 164 vs 162 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Consumes up to 21% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 65 vs 82 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |