Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1275 v5 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1275 v5 is 1080 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5
- Performs up to 1% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 247 vs 245 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
HD Graphics P530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |