Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 1586 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 7% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 357 vs 335 FPS
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 - 65 vs 84 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
357
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£146.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £146.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |