Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1625 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 77 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Lost Ark than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 249 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 44 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 8 | Threads | 44 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
