Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800X - 77 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 208 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
208
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.99/FPS
100%
Price, £
£205
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3800X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |