Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 18% better in Minecraft than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 728 vs 619 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £186.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68754 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
638
38.85505481120585%
Multi-Core
2254
32.2%
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |