Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1275 v2 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1275 v2 is 350 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-4350 - 171 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
