Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8400 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-8400 is 2377 days newer than Xeon E3-1270.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1270 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 - 65 vs 80 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.21/FPS
100%
Price, £
£146.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £146.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11004 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 | vs | Intel Core i5-8400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |