Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon E3-1270 v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 1655 days newer than Xeon E3-1270 v5.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 175 vs 172 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
175
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.28/FPS
100%
Price, £
£224.84
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £224.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18251 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |