Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1270 v3 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1270 v3 is 599 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3
- Performs up to 12% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-4100 - 199 vs 177 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 80 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1270 v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v3 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
