Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1094 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 45 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 255 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1265L v3
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
