Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 759 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 134 vs 133 FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
134
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.6/FPS
100%
Price, £
£80.09
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £80.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |