Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 1718 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 45 vs 62 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 4% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 545 vs 525 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
545
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£188.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 596 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 62 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |