Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3404 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 45 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 34% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 163 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.75/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |