Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 3228 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 155% better in Diablo IV than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 268 vs 105 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
268
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.85/FPS
100%
Price, £
£228.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £228.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43957 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
25.88668816213726%
Multi-Core
1875
20.444880601897285%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |