Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8300 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8300 is 2102 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than Intel Core i3-8300 - 45 vs 62 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8300
- Performs up to 13% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 140 vs 124 FPS
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
140
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.26/FPS
100%
Price, £
£176.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £176.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12411 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-8300 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 62 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |