Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 84 days older than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400S - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1260L - 151 vs 149 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
