Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield 2042 than Xeon E3-1260L - 176 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 12 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
176
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.97/FPS
100%
Price, £
£169.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £169.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |