Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3500X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3500X is 3096 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3500X - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500X
- Performs up to 6% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E3-1260L - 314 vs 297 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
FPS
314
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.27/FPS
100%
Price, £
£83.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £83.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2380 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 24th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |