Buy on Amazon
£49.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 757 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1260L - 155 vs 154 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
155
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.32/FPS
100%
Price, £
£49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD FX-6350 Black Edition CPU (AM3+, Hex Core, 3.90GHz, 14MB, 125W, Advanced Bit Manipulation)
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 478 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
