Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E3-1260L v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1357 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 45 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 11% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 226 vs 204 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 - 16 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E3-1260L v5
Server/Workstation • Oct 19th, 2015
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L v5 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 19th, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
