Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1245 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4195 days newer than Xeon E3-1245.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1245 - 139 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 - 32 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for £405.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65827 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Single-Core
590
19.84527413387151%
Multi-Core
2017
10.034326650415402%
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |