Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1245 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1245 is 757 days older than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than FX-4350 - 614 vs 601 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E3-1245
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
