Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E3-1245 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2330 days newer than Xeon E3-1245 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E3-1245 v3 - 228 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 - 20 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
228
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.48/FPS
100%
Price, £
£565
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £565 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10940 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1245 v3 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD P4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |