Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 4663 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 48% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Xeon E3-1240 - 163 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1240 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
163
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.34/FPS
100%
Price, £
£545
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £545 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |